The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 20

Re: I'll bet you can
In Response To: I'll bet you can ()

But when there is an issue that involves the board they have to go to independent counsel.
Are you sure those people you refer to are not just on fully paid retainers from law firms rather than being on the payroll of the corporation? They may appear to be corporation employees because they work there full time, but technically they are not.
When I worked in the banking industry for example, it was a legal requirement that independent counsel was retained, even though the banks had entire departments of legal advisers.

I believe there are issues with what is being proposed and I bet you could forsee more issues than I could grin

Messages In This Thread

Question about the "2010 Constitutional.....
Re: Question about the "2010 Constitutional.....
As Barry noted, Eric Rosenblum
Actually, the reason for the ammendment is because
Re: Actually, the reason for the ammendment is bec
grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin
Re: grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin
I'll bet you can
Re: I'll bet you can
Re: I'll bet you can
You convinced her in exchange for what? vbg
Re: You convinced her in exchange for what? vbg
I am no corporations expert...
See my email.
Michael Siskin could swear Eric in.
Of course, I would have to be there...
Jim Reilly has not been to a convention in years.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg