The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 20

Actually, the reason for the ammendment is because

... at last year's convention, the BOD announced at the club's annual meeting that they were expanding the BOD by adding the club counsel as a non-voting Board Member. The minutes will reflect that I challenged their authority to do so ... nothing personal against Eric ... but my challenge was that the BOD is comprised of FIVE, not SIX, members per the Constitution. This ammendment if passed will now make it legal.

BTW: I have the highest regard and respect for Eric Rosenblum and my objection last year was no personal reflection upon Eric, or his past role as general counsel and his valuable legal contributions to the club. My objection was to the Board action that I felt they did not have the authority to make this change to expand the Board unilaterally without ammending the club's Constitution.

I support the proposed ammendment as written.

Messages In This Thread

Question about the "2010 Constitutional.....
Re: Question about the "2010 Constitutional.....
As Barry noted, Eric Rosenblum
Actually, the reason for the ammendment is because
Re: Actually, the reason for the ammendment is bec
grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin
Re: grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin
I'll bet you can
Re: I'll bet you can
Re: I'll bet you can
You convinced her in exchange for what? vbg
Re: You convinced her in exchange for what? vbg
I am no corporations expert...
See my email.
Michael Siskin could swear Eric in.
Of course, I would have to be there...
Jim Reilly has not been to a convention in years.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg