Custom Search
FAQ's
|
Archives
|
Formatting
|
First Time Users Click Here
Forgot your Password?
RSS
Return to Index
Gallery Index
Read Responses
The Chip Board Archive 18
Re: A poor attitude from you also.
In Response To:
A poor attitude from you also.
()
Do you always judge people by what they are alleged to have done or not done 5-1/2 years ago?
Since you asked, not always but sometimes. Case in point 9/11/2001. That judgement is set in stone.
Messages In This Thread
Courtesy and professionalism...a question
hit 'em with the negative.
Here are his negs...see any similarities?
This is a member?....WOW!!!
With all those negs ...
Re: With all those negs ...I was warned
WOW! Less than 30 seconds after my post...
Something positive from another member
Rick, can you post his ebay name?
email me and I will give it to you
Rick Can I have money too? LOL....
Holy Hot Controversy Batman
Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback?
Re: Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback?
Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
What a load of crap!
Rick Is 100% Correct
I'll bet you 100 chips that the USPS will tell any
Wrong
Let's hope it doesn't get to "a court of law"
Rick, I think you are way out of line.
David with all due respect...
"you are not privy to the emails"
Well David...since you ask...
A poor attitude from you also.
I disagree with you, David
Opinion noted, and I will add......
Re: A poor attitude from you also.
OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
Re: OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
Aye Carumba.....David,David,
Re: Aye Carumba.....David,David,
I was told that I could NOT insure To Canada
Priority mail to Canada is insured
Re: What a load of crap!
Wow.....
Josh.........
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Here is my thinking
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Send it to Vegas!
Re: Send it to Vegas!
Here is what to do.......
But who knows.......
Question for Rick
My take on "Insurance"
Re: Question for Rick
Raises a question though........
Re: Raises a question though........
At the end of the day though,
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Good Point
HOLD ON GUYS.....
Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Code of Ethics?
Re: Code of Ethics?
I agree ......
I don't want to go that route
Re: I agree ......
We Have Been Over This Before and
Just a suggestion
Everyone has an opinion, so do I
I would never ship anything of value w/o insurance
So, Rick... Care to tell the class what you've ..
I learned this:
Rick you sure have a lot of bad luck!
Since you asked for opinions, here's mine...
Why is it so hard to understand the risk of loss?
Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
I N S U R A N C E
Show me a link to the auction...
I haven't read the auction description ...
Under insurance, it says, "none"
INSURANCE WAS NOT OFFERED!
THEN WHY DID SPRAGG SAY IT WAS; AND YOU REFUSED IT
No idea and because this has gone on for far too l
Lets end this discussion..this is getting silly
Don't be a liar Rick
Re: Don't be a liar Rick
Yawn.............
Re: I N S U R A N C E
Re: Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
Oops. I didn't mean for my post...
You are a fine, upstanding guy, Brian
Re: Wherer is the basic rule of law..
It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Yes...
Re: Yes...
Re: Yes...
Re: litigated to death long ago
Find a case that shows that I'm wrong
Here's the "UCC" From Cornell Univ Law School site
See Part 3: § 2-301 General Obligations of Parties
It's UCC section 2-509
ok here's my rebuttal argument
...
Nice try
Re: Nice try
In this case, Gene, you are wrong
Re:Sorry I pitched the fork
Wait, Aaron Should Be Around Soon
Not that soon I wouldn't think
Who needs Aaron, anyway? We have Gene to interpret
Re: you are wrong Maybe Not!!!
ok, now you have me
Thanks, Michael.
One final point
PLease
Rich, you have holes in your example...
Re: Rich, you have holes in your example...
I guess we can agree to disagree...
Re: I guess we can agree to disagree...
arrrg!!!
I'm done.
Also I wanted to say thanks for the debate...
Here's a better example:
I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Mailing receipt ..
Excellent point, Michael (about no insurance).
You are 100% correct , Barry
I don't agree .......................
Yes, as I noted elsewhere ...
Good grief John....
"Good grief.."? Josh shows us he offered insurance
OK HERE'S MY 2 CENTS ON THIS SUBJECT!!!!!!!!
Hmmmm...guess this isn't going away
Geez... I looked at your auction and don't see....
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
FAQ's
|
Archives
|
File Upload
|
Formatting
|
First Time Users Click Here
Copyright 2022 David Spragg