|
|
|
... I'd be 100% sure you're right about the necessity of geting caught in the act to prove the cheating charge. I'm not quite as sure about Vegas. But, as I mentioned in my post to Gene, I doubt that it would actually go that far.
>> I'm confident that my very capable attorney, Jim Reilly Esq., could convince
>> the judge that "running it back in at $1 or more" is not the ONLY reason
>> these chips take a hike.
I appreciate the compliment. BTW, I just raised my fees accordingly! <g>
----- jim o\-S
|
|