Archie, no disagreement with the seller being off base, etc., still the error is compounded by the books we all trust to give us accurate information. She is ignorant about where the chip came from but are the two authors wrong? It is equally important to me!

Additionally, the provenance of the chip not being from PR while obviously accurate also takes issue with the authenticity of the chip, as opposed to fantasy/fake, regardless of where it was or was not used!

So, which is more important, misidentifying a chip as to where it came from and/or identifying the chip as being a fake/fantasy and/or finally idenifying the chip but incorrectly?