The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 03

As you may have noticed, there was no ...

... in my original comment, either, Archie. I was serious about that & would have assumed that your comment was intended seriously as well, even without the caveat.

>> How about those few who have the guts to respond in an attempt to set the record straight by challenging some of the outrageous claims and sometimes misleading and untrue statements by some of the more "outspoken" critics of the hobby who think they have all the answers to complex issues? <<

No question that the posters you refer to in your comment are also important to the hobby and the exchange of information on the board. Personally, I appreciate their efforts (as long as they don't post anonymously!).

----- jim o\-S

Messages In This Thread

Posting Without a Name
Re: Posting Without a Name
Re: Posting Without a Name
Re: Posting Without a Name
Anonymous letters to the editor ...
Re: Anonymous letters to the editor ...
Re: Anonymous letters to the editor ...
Yes, that's one of Chuck's more ...
Re: Yes, that's one of Chuck's more ...
Re: I'm so stupid that....
Re: I'm so stupid that....
Re: Don't be sorry
Re: I'm so stupid that....
Strong but ...
Re: I have a different view......
Re: I have a different view......
Re: I have a last name...
As you may have noticed, there was no ...
Oops, that was supposed to read ...
Re: Anonymous letters to the editor ...
You're right on that point ...
Re: You too??!!
Re: You too??!!
Re: especially when...
I was wondering who that was ...
Re: That's okay Jim....
Re: That's okay Jim....
Re: That's okay Jim....
Re: already posted one....
Maybe not ...
Re: Oh, that's good...but
Then how do you explain this?
Katie!!! What big...
I take it all back ...
Re: I need to check...
Re: I should have read....
Re: I knew Greg couldn't resist ....

Copyright 2022 David Spragg