The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 11

>> I've been told that ...

>> ... I have a pretty good imagination

Yep, pretty much everything you've had to say has been imaginery. And now that you're back to giving legal advice, you got it wrong again.

Bill >>>> I would imagine that if they chose to, they COULD go to chip shows and take
>>>> their chips back. They could send someone after you if you sell them on eBay.

Stu >> I would imagine that they can't and I've been told that I have a
>> pretty good imagination. I believe the legal term is equitable estoppel.

"Equitable estoppel" cannot possibly have any application to this situation. It is a legal principle which applies where one party makes a promise (and here comes the key point, so pay attention) without consideration, but nevertheless can be held to the promise because it induces the other party to rely upon the promise to his detriment.

In the case of chips, the casino gives you a chip with the promise to give you the money back when you return it. You provide the consideration when you give the casino the dollar value of the chip. There is no detrimental reliance because you can always get your money back by returning the chip.

Think you'll ever get one of these right? ----- jim o\-S

Messages In This Thread

Taking Chips From Casinos
Re: Taking Chips From Casinos
Re: Taking Chips From Casinos
and my wife said, More junk, huh?
Re: Taking Chips From Casinos
Re: Taking Chips From Casinos
Re: Taking Chips From Casinos
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
>> If folks want to know about me ...
Re: >> If folks want to know about me ...
Liberals?!
Re: Liberals?!
Wow, Stu, a specific, straight answer ...
Re: Wow, Stu, a specific, straight answer ...
Demonstrating once again that ...
Re: Demonstrating once again that ...
I am under no illusions about ...
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
>> I've been told that ...
I dont know why you are carrying on the argument
Re: I dont know why you are carrying on the argume
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, I'm keeping 'em!
Re: I bought 'em, Barry
Re: I bought 'em, Barry
Re: I bought 'em, Barry
Re: I bought 'em, Barry
Re: I bought 'em, Norm
Re: I bought 'em, Barry
Re: I bought 'em, Barry
Re: Trimble's quote ...
Don't they have cameras in FL?
Re: Don't they have cameras in FL?
Re: Don't they have cameras in FL?
Gene -vs- Stu: The verbal assualt

Copyright 2022 David Spragg