I agree that the rules might need revisiting. If there were rules in place that would / could have addressed every aspect of this issue it wouldn't have made any difference anyway because Mr. W. was not a member and had no reason to be compelled to abide by our rules anyway. Right?

I was pleased to hear what Michael Knapp had to say. We are a good group of people, sometimes out of frustration our passions become misdirected. I understand this is a 'No hold barred' discussion board, but maybe we need to slow down a bit and think about our actions.