The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Got it. Thanks.
In Response To: Got it. Thanks. ()

Great, let's hope they help.
Just some loose ends, not looking for an argument just putting context to your "Are you not aware" post. I am indeed aware but it may be more a case of your not being aware of what I meant due to not mentioning the whole quote and just part of it. Maybe there’s another reason but nothing I can think of at the moment.
I didn't object to the post at all. I just mentioned that there was no reason to say what was in the title as it was an obvious dig. Why would I object to something that (according to you but as mentioned below, incorrect and put to bed long ago as far as I was concerned) I had been constantly saying should be on the guide.
I actually don't read any of your posts unless it has some relevance to me in some way so no, I don't know most of the things you say I do about not being able to update as most others do or the problems you have had for whatever reason. Surely you could have just emailed Charles or a UK admin (as you know at least one of those) and asked them to put the word on instead of making a grand gesture about it.
My posts about Portsmouth don't just mention jetons, they actually say "they are jetons NOT chips" which is totally different.
That is what I keep saying over and over because it is true. You say that jeton translates as chip in English, no it doesn't but Casino jetons in other languages do which is also totally different. Casino jeton does translate as casino token in English though.
I do not have a problem with the guide and never stated that I have (and have contacted them but didn't see any reason to tell you that).
I think I mentioned a couple of times that they could add jeton in the notes (not as the mold or any other position) which you said was not needed but that was not my point. I believe I stopped saying about putting the word jeton on as that would also add to the confusion and you had said that it wasn't needed, more than once.
Yes, it is worse as it is a glaring "error" in my opinion as people will look and think, well if it's a jeton why is it in chips.
The comment I made about connections or favours was worded as "I guess" not a statement of fact and no "secret" was mentioned anywhere.
No idea what you mean by stating Portsmouth says chips not jetons as they are under roulette chips so is that what you mean?
You have not done what I constantly asked you to do as all I asked was that you acknowledged that they could be put under either section and not just chips which you refused to do hence my having to repeat it but using the whole quote makes much more sense. If only you had done the 1 thing I had asked then we could have saved everybody's pain having to wade through all that rubbish.
Nope, I never complained that the word jeton wasn't there, just that it is not a chip. I could well have mentioned it once but as I had to keep repeating myself maybe I said it more than once but still, irrelevant and out of context. Put to bed as mentioned already.
Also, I didn't mention your condition in a derogatory way which you tried to make out I did which was low.
Neither did I complain constantly that the word jeton wasn't there, it was always about them not being chips.
As for doing my job, it was not mine to do as you had already said it wasn’t needed so why would I then contact the guide to get them to put it up, doesn’t make any sense.
There are many more loose ends and things you have totally taken out of context but they are the main ones you mention on that post.
As I said, not looking for an argument or discussion just correcting or adding context (or the whole quote not just part of it) to your "points."
It's all meaningless anyway but loose ends need tidying up (like the UK guide). Hopefully that clears up most of the things on that particular post that were either half-truths or totally taken out of context (or maybe just misunderstood).
You also made out that my comment about hot stamp was in poor taste when all I was doing was mentioning the main 3 points in the bit you kept showing, that was it. There was nothing more to it than that. You just chose to pick on that and not the other 2 relevant parts.
Good luck with the 1960s articles, I look forward to seeing if anything is relevant to French roulette jetons or any other types mentioned.

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide (and if nobody objects)
Re: As you just can't stop.
Are you not aware of your own actions ?
Here is your post
My response agreeing with you to calm you down
Re: I didn't object to your posting here.
Okay. Thanks.
I object
OK. it was an attempt in trying to accommodate
Re: Really?
I object fully! & small auction.
1 denomination collectors interested?
Well explained, Jo. "MOLD" was Garin's ~~~
Re: How hard is it to understand?
Re: An apology.
Thanks, again, Still trying to contact a couple ~~
Got it. Thanks.
Re: Got it. Thanks.
Re: Got it. Thanks.
Re: Just what I’ve heard.
Re: Just what I’ve heard.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg