The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Oh, stop whining.

One minute you are saying you sent documentation but then that they just did it themselves. So which is it? The more you "talk" the harder it is to decipher what is actually correct, true or actually being said inbetween all the waffle and going off on tangients. You don't do it all the time but quite a lot, no problem, just how you are, we understand.
I said later that it didn't matter if you did or didn't which was correct as it doesn't matter, the point is and has always been, they are roulette jetons. Only the first 2 parts were debatable really (connections/favours). You like to take the credit for the move and I don't see the point in having to explain why it isn't strictly correct to the admins as they have enough to do plus it was because of you banging on about them for so long (so I said well done and who's a clever boy) as they were happy where they were until you started so it's obviously down to you either way so again, well done.
Just think of my post as "a perfect post" that has "good and fine people on both sides," would that help?
Or maybe, think of it like me saying I'll fix the guide within a week but don't manage even after 4 years.
Is this just a witch hunt just because I do it for other people's benefit as they find it confusing?
Get over yourself and stop mentioning me in any way, shape or form as I'd prefer not to be associated with you at all, tyvm.
As for not putting them on the guide because of me, how does that work then? You put them on the guide (with the sizes) and they will put them in the category you ask them too, simple. That way they can also be under roulette chips and not jetons and you will be even happier. Don't worry, you can (and surely will) continue to go on about them for years yet but at least that way, you can do it in a much more productive way.
Enjoy them, good bye.

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg