The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
In Response To: Re: Yep. ()

Gentleman!? I very much doubt that you know the meaning of the word and I can’t imagine for one moment that you’ve ever been called it. I treat people how I’d like to be treated myself and if that fails, how they treat me so if you wish to treat me with contempt don’t cry when it is given back. I don’t like to talk to people who play, act or are ignorant just because they are good at it.
Concerning your usage of bananas, on the other hand, I expect you and most of the people that know you are fully versed in the context in the way you used it although in this instance, it is not correct. Frustration is actually what my comments stem from as I made the mistake (yet again) of trying to have a civilised conversation which you can’t seem to handle well at all and as you like to make “digs” which I can’t be bothered to do, I’ll just say it as I see it.
Having a go at Rick for saying “Give it a rest” and going off on one about his earlier comment by saying, don’t ever ask me blah, blah, blah was small minded, petty and childish although totally understandable as you are very like a cheap, knock-off, mini me copy of your hero, the Marmite Berk so that’s not really a surprise but it was totally uncalled for. That’s probably where the projection comes from too. And the playing the victim after being the one who instigated whatever it is that you are whining about at any given moment.
To just belittle anybody else’s contribution, advice or opinion about the jetons and just keep mentioning Tom’s information (which although excellent is flawed or do you believe they are hot stamped?) over and over again is not just ridiculous but also very narrow minded.
I understand that you are excited as it is a novel situation for you as they will be the first actual, tangible items you will have on the UK Playboy section as opposed to the 2 photos taken from a catalogue that we hear about constantly but that’s no excuse to act like an ungrateful child when people take the time to bother to offer information.
The only time my posts are long is when you are involved but as you never read them, I do it for myself and others not you.
I realise that trolls like to have the last word so feel free, maybe just repeat the usual stuff and the rest of us can get on with using our time more productively. Maybe even you could try by helping the guide and tidying it up or filling gaps, for instance.
Go on, knock yourself out. Hopefully you won’t twist something said already into something it isn’t but whatever, nobody cares any more.

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg