We've seen that lots of times, doesn't help any more than the first time as it calls them jetons and mentions roulette plus I'm pretty sure that they aren't hot stamped either.
No, you didn't just say that but it doesn't matter as whatever you say is worthless anyway.
And I quote just one of your incorrect assumptions................"And I'm saying if you did see them before you would have mentioned it somewhere or you would have at least let Tom onow. You must be confused by maybe seeing the Portsmouth and when you saw mine you thought the Portsmouth were these." which is just a stupid comment but then, you are full of them.
There is another that spouts more mistakes which I can't be bothered to find it but basically it implies I am not telling the truth. Then there's the other one where you "seriously doubt" what I said. You know, the one where you are even more hypocritical than usual by saying that I enjoy sharing my finds and say a lot about them, the King of waffle says what? I share them for other people's benefit not my own fragile ego. As for Le Cercle, again I like to share information which is what I did along with photos. Most people seemed to enjoy them plus they weren't just repeats of the same old items. At least I don't spout on about the same old rubbish just so I can feel self important. Plus I usually try to stay on point instead of contradicting myself (sometimes even in the same sentence) and attempt to make it interesting, not hard work or brain aching, to read.
Yes, I enjoy adding things to the guide, what's wrong with that? How can you attempt (and fail dismally) to make that out to be a bad thing? Sharing information is good, isn't it? And photos of new finds help fill the gaps on the guide. Maybe you could try it sometime, apart from UFCs, obviously.
Man up for once in your life and don't try to deny what you said, it's still there in black and white (not yet deleted).
|