The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.

I thought we had agreed that they are jetons (as Tom also states) and as the section is clearly called roulette CHIPS then it is incorrect to place them there so I am not just claiming that they are jetons, they are jetons as you agreed and Tom also states.
The Portsmouth ones are under jetons as the London ones should be and it is an abnormality for the London ones already listed under roulette CHIPS to be there as no others are in the guide (as far as I am aware), surely it makes more sense as they stand out as not being quite right.
And I didn't claim that they were unimportant and shouldn't be placed under roulettes so please stop making things up. I explained clearly why I thought they should be under jetons but obviously, you can't get your head around that. That is not my fault.
As to crest and seal, they were used on roulette (and also other games like cards) but I don't think there is a section called crest and seals so it is irrelevant and nothing to do with this discussion.
The Portsmouth ones are listed under jetons so why should the London ones be under roulette chips? No reason at all, they had the same use.
As I said, as they are JETONS that is where they should be listed maybe with a note to say that they were used on the French roulette tables as that covers all the bases and fits better, in my opinion. Listing them as roulette CHIPS is incorrect as they (by Toms, mine and your own definition) are JETONS. Are you getting it yet?
The type of item should be placed above what type of table they were used on in most cases, I would have thought.
You keep waffling on all you like but I've said my piece and explained why I believe they should be listed under jetons so please stop making things up that I didn't say as it isn't right. If you don't like it or don't agree, fine, that's entirely up to you. Thanks.

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg