I would have thought that you of all people would realise that sometimes minor details that are not corrected/explained at the time can lead to somebody else taking it at face value, repeating it, expanding on it and then it becomes more than it actually is, later. That is the only reason I'd hoped that the 2 comments could be clarified so that it wouldn't happen in the future in regards to the plaques.
Of course it is the chipguide's decision and as the Playboy "Crockfords" chips are on the Playboy page even though they were never used in the casino, the logical place would be to leave it where it is. I just thought that David's opinion had merit due to the reasons I explained or as much as any other hypothesis about them and made a throw away (or just badly worded) remark about it.
Here's hoping that the article turns up and we get to know more.