The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Yep.

It confirms 1 part which is that there was a gold and diamond £100,000 plaque but all the rest wasn't 100% correct, not that it matters.
It would be better to be able to confirm that he told you this (as asked but ignored)...............

For Tom to mention the £100,000 "plaques" in his book and the exact process how they became, he had to have got the information from someone who knew what they were talking about; either Victor or someone very close to Victor.......

Or if it is just speculation on your part with no basis in actual facts. He could have found that out by a variety of means and I'm glad he did.

Or maybe it would be nice to know how you could make the 2nd part below (in which you were talking about Playboy) to them mean something totally different when asked about it.

For Tom to mention the £100,000 "plaques" in his book and the exact process how they became, he had to have got the information from someone who knew what they were talking about; either Victor or someone very close to Victor... and there could be very good reason why nothing else is known (mentioned); especially if only used on a private game and in a private room where nobody else would know they existed -- except the manufacturer... and I think there were exactly 10 pieces of the £100,000 made and not 11, as with other very low productions where one piece was kept in shop.

Which then became this.............

I said "I think" regarding a production of 10 in referring to the known numbers I know of in the production of the 1.000.000Bef Oostende production delivered to the property which is archived here along with other low productions of high denoms with serial numbers from 1 to 10 and I did not refer to Playboy except for saying "I think..."

Which is a totally different proposition and could not have been seen to be about anything other than Playboy plaques when mentioned in the Playboy thread and I doubt anybody but you would have been able to see that you were talking about something other than the Playboy ones.

To be honest, I don't really care any more as you are just waffling on to make yourself seem important and know something that the rest of us don't when in actual fact we can also read and have had the pleasure of reading Tom's book.

Messages In This Thread

(Message Deleted by Poster)
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: A gold one?
Re: A gold one?
A gold one? Here's an exact description of it ~~~
Re: 1st Playboy book.
I, too, seem to recall a greater value tha £8,000
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Tom mentions the cost of the first £100,000 ~~~
Re: Negotiable plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
I responded to your post you made in my thread ~~.
..and here are my responses.
Re: I responded to your post you made in my thread
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: It's not that hard, surely.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Rubbish.
The best possible photos are probably right under
Re: The best possible photos are probably right un
Yep. It all confirmed Tom was 100% correct ~~~
Re: Yep.
Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~
Re: Yep, that is clear.
Nothing needed to be confirmed with what Tom said
Re: As I suspected, just speculation.
I explained the thing about the diamonds ~~~.
He clearly is responding in a PLAYBOY thread ~~~
Now I have one question for you, Garin.
Re: That's an easy one.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Thanks David.
...and it also appears that Tom got the info ~~~
Re: Assumptions.
I think you're on the right track with the mixup ~
That would be for either or both ChipGuide Webmast
Re: Assumptions.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg