The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.

I'll try again but on this thread.
On what facts are you basing your "and I think there were exactly 10 pieces of the £100,000 made and not 11" statement on?
I didn't see the original thread (or I don't remember it) when David mentions the Playboy plaque at the Lownes' house or I would have asked if was definitely Playboy and if it had diamonds so did anybody else ask?
I also didn't know that he had seen order cards that mention plaques either but then I don't see many threads on here unless I am looking for a specific one. Did he mention which plaques had order cards (apart from the £10,000)?
I can only guess if was where he mentioned the £100,000 plaques that your comment is based upon. Is that correct?

Messages In This Thread

(Message Deleted by Poster)
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: A gold one?
Re: A gold one?
A gold one? Here's an exact description of it ~~~
Re: 1st Playboy book.
I, too, seem to recall a greater value tha £8,000
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Tom mentions the cost of the first £100,000 ~~~
Re: Negotiable plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
I responded to your post you made in my thread ~~.
..and here are my responses.
Re: I responded to your post you made in my thread
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: It's not that hard, surely.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Rubbish.
The best possible photos are probably right under
Re: The best possible photos are probably right un
Yep. It all confirmed Tom was 100% correct ~~~
Re: Yep.
Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~
Re: Yep, that is clear.
Nothing needed to be confirmed with what Tom said
Re: As I suspected, just speculation.
I explained the thing about the diamonds ~~~.
He clearly is responding in a PLAYBOY thread ~~~
Now I have one question for you, Garin.
Re: That's an easy one.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Thanks David.
...and it also appears that Tom got the info ~~~
Re: Assumptions.
I think you're on the right track with the mixup ~
That would be for either or both ChipGuide Webmast
Re: Assumptions.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg