No such thing around here... and, what I said was only pertaining to orchestrated, late votes being accepted that the Court may want to examine (review) which is FACT and which possibly may lead them to intercede, elsewhere, where they may not have been interested to do, previously. Good attorneys know how to do this via case histories. Again, FACT, well known. And, yes, we all know when those accepted ballots were dated... and nobody on Trump's team has to say a word to the press since they are not judges... even though they think they are. Which boils down to what you posted means nothing pertaining to where the court may want to go.