~~~ casual nature when compared to that of the ANA HOF or that of a museum HOF... and since our number one objective is education, I feel those who have penned any work pertaining to our hobby should be one of the most important considerations (and not the only) in the process of first recommending and then the final vote for induction without any restrictions as you mentioned and, in fact; I think any one who might be considered who holds or held a position of club officer has at least pleased enough of membership to be comfortable in seeing them move up to our highest honor. As it stands right now, and as I had mentioned below; we have no restrictions as to who can be recommended and proceed forward and I think we should not try to fix anything that isn't as some are suggesting, broken. All I see standing in our way right now is the lack of our interest in doing what has to be done by actually making that recommondition to the best and fullest method possible. The talk of who should be part of our HOF doesn't do it; only action does.