Let me ask this. Had Joe stolen from a club member, and there was ample proof, wouldn't he have been thrown out of the club? But because "all he did was talk openly about how he degraded every woman on the planet and how he especially had a thing for underage Asian girls", we just shrug our shoulders and say "We'll call him The Creeper and go from there. And if a woman has a problem with this, then it's HER fault for not knowing WHY we call him The Creeper!" Had Joe stolen from a club member, some might defend him, saying he never stole from them. But most would agree that he was wrong and should lose his membership.

So let me get this straight. We value an item with a casino's name on it more than the human beings Joe openly and gleefully degraded? THAT is one hell of a statement we are making as an organization about our priorities.