Sums up the first paragraph.
I told you why I said about your convincing the guide (although not the words I used) as you couldn't seem to make your mind up, one minute you haven't contacted them and the next you say you've sent documentation so no wonder it's confusing and I said what I said. That has not been mentioned since I explained that to you but as you don't read my posts and just want to bang on about it for as long as you can, fine, whatever.
Poor taste? Not at all, I just mentioned that it said they were roulettes, they were jetons and that they were hot stamped which is exactly what it says and what you keep using to justify what you are repeating constantly. And I didn't say it was wrong in a bad way (it was just stating a fact), I just stated the 3 main points that were mentioned so no, poor taste it isn't but any chance to twist words around to try to make somebody look bad, eh, totally expected. I have the utmost respect for Tom and his work concerning Playboy so to try to make it out any other way is disingenuous to say the least. Mind you, another thing you are good at so no surprise ther either.
The last sentence is just plain rubbish and again has been addressed, I know that is your favourite way of speaking but just give it up or read my posts so you can see that you are going over old ground that has been covered and explained multiple times. I have told you why I said what I said and as to stopping (and stopping now) please feel free to take your own advice. Do us all a favour. I will happily stop when you stop banging on about the same old irrelevant rubbish (not that I ever expect that to ever happen) when it concerns UK Playboy stuff.
Is that it, are we done? Or will you wish to spout more rubbish just so you can have the last word? Feel free.