The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Addressed many times.

But you are obviously too stubborn to see that. Yes, I did mention about the jetons being in the wrong place many years ago, try reading the 4 or 5 times I've told you that. Maybe use the crowbar to release your head from it's natural resting place.
Obviously, it is not me that can't let it go, boy I've tried to escape this this pointless conversation but you keep whining and complaining to the rest of the world about what I’ve said instead of having the gonads to take it up with me. You are more than welcome to refute anything I have said about you at any time. I’ll probably try my best to ignore you but as you like to throw in a few snide remarks, that may be hard.
You know as well as I do, if you keep using screenshots about what I have said or even quoting me (usually out of context) then I have to comment, you leave me no choice so the quicker you stop, the less I will say.
I haven’t said anything that isn’t pretty much based in the truth (and well known) but as you are a blowhard that craves attention, you just keep banging on and on and on and repeating the same old rubbish. Just because you say it 20 times, doesn't make it true.
As to the Crete comment, it was obvious what I was getting at and nothing to do with your family (more your ancestors) and if you can’t work that out then don’t whinge about things you don’t understand.
Talk about the find all you want, and say whatever you wish so you can speculate as much as you will surely will but just leave me out of it and I’ll stay silent. That can’t be that hard to understand, surely.
I will happily let it go, just stop using my words in any context (but especially an incorrect one) and I’ll shut up. Trust me, I am more than happy to do that.
Anything else that you keep using alternative facts for then great, do what you want. You will anyway.

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg