The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: The answer.
In Response To: Re: Oh, stop whining. ()

Unless Charles or the UK admins wish to comment on here (I don't see the point in bothering them in an email) to offer the reason why they are in roulette chips and not jetons which may help.........
Why don't we ask people on the board what they think is closest to how they should be classed (although I expect the odds to be stacked against me for a number of reasons all of which are obvious but no worries, it doesn't matter) and hope that they answer honestly. You know, get other people's opinions, something you may not be able to comprehend I know, but you can try. They may even want to explain their thought process.
Are they American style roulette chips (as they are ND and in different colours like AR chips) and should be on the guide as roulette chips with no explanation as it is obvious they are jetons. I think that covers all the things you've said to justify where they are on the guide.
Or........ Are they French style jetons that should be under jetons with a note saying that they were used on the roulette tables (French or hybrid).
It's probably pointless as only 1 person so far has offered an opinion but it'll keep them (and you) the centre of attention.
I doubt anybody really cares any more (if they ever did) and doubt it will have any effect at all but it's worth a try.
Hopefully, it'll mean you can say something different instead of just repeating yourself and also, nobody has to listen to me any more.
You can start the thread and I'll try to keep away so it'll all yours. You can even say it is your idea.
Just try to stop mentioning and showing the table that says they are roulette, jetons and have a hot stamp.
Go on, enjoy yourself.

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg