The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Yep.

We've seen that lots of times, doesn't help any more than the first time as it calls them jetons and mentions roulette plus I'm pretty sure that they aren't hot stamped either.
No, you didn't just say that but it doesn't matter as whatever you say is worthless anyway.
And I quote just one of your incorrect assumptions................"And I'm saying if you did see them before you would have mentioned it somewhere or you would have at least let Tom onow. You must be confused by maybe seeing the Portsmouth and when you saw mine you thought the Portsmouth were these." which is just a stupid comment but then, you are full of them.
There is another that spouts more mistakes which I can't be bothered to find it but basically it implies I am not telling the truth. Then there's the other one where you "seriously doubt" what I said. You know, the one where you are even more hypocritical than usual by saying that I enjoy sharing my finds and say a lot about them, the King of waffle says what? I share them for other people's benefit not my own fragile ego. As for Le Cercle, again I like to share information which is what I did along with photos. Most people seemed to enjoy them plus they weren't just repeats of the same old items. At least I don't spout on about the same old rubbish just so I can feel self important. Plus I usually try to stay on point instead of contradicting myself (sometimes even in the same sentence) and attempt to make it interesting, not hard work or brain aching, to read.
Yes, I enjoy adding things to the guide, what's wrong with that? How can you attempt (and fail dismally) to make that out to be a bad thing? Sharing information is good, isn't it? And photos of new finds help fill the gaps on the guide. Maybe you could try it sometime, apart from UFCs, obviously.
Man up for once in your life and don't try to deny what you said, it's still there in black and white (not yet deleted).

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg