The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~

~~~ that we strive for in order to continue to maintain ChipGuide the most complete and accurate catalog of its kind in the World, where we currently include a segment on the Portsmouth Casino Club page of the guide which states the club, at one time in its operation history in having four Roulette tables somewhere between 1973 and 1982, and clearly explains and illustrates examples of Roulettes different than the mentioned clay style and the French style Rrouettes and in great length
defines that the jeton type Roulettes are free of any denomination as are any traditional clay Roulette chips except these being the Bourgogne et Grasser plastic laminate jeton which was used to place bets on a Roulette table at Portsmouth and if yes (whenever ChipGuide decides) that the first series and the jeton with the Red Bunny depicted on the guide and seen below assigned as Roupettes should also continue to remain Roulettes and designated as Roulettes by being placed under a heading reading Roulettes up to a point where we find the documentation as not being accurate and then, if the case, simply return to what we presently have or, change what we presently have and label the defined Roulettes under a "jeton" section and include a note saying they are Rouettes as Mr G. Williamson suggests and, if that is the choice, why not simply call them what they are, Roulettes?

He is claiming they are ietons and that their gaming purpose is not important enough to list them as qRoulettes which is like saying a Roulette in the form of a "Crest and Seal" from a casino should not be listed as a Roulette.

I do not own a single Roulette from Portsmouth but, I think my not listing a Roulette as such will only confuse matters.

All of the above in Mr G. Williamson's suggestion, he feels should also apply to the Playboy Club London where now exists the Roulette jetons listed under Rpulettes.

Sorry for any spelling typos...

Messages In This Thread

ChipGuide; Is this sufficient documentation ~~~
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
They are clearly called Roulette jetons in ~q
Re: You're just talking for the sake of it.
You just repeated what you have been saying ☆~
Re: Rubbish.
Nope, never said all jetons should be moved to ~~~
Re: I never said you did.........
Re: You just repeated what you have been saying
Maybe it is you who should "Give it a rest." ?
Re: Just send to the ChipGuide.
Re: Exactly my point.
Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: London ones are in jetons.
Only the one series.. Temporary reassignment
Re: Doesn't matter.
Re: Hope the other 2 turn up one day.
The fact still remains that they are Roulettes ~~~
Re: Whatever.
Re: Pointless.
. I only included an image; no link.
Re: The one you deleted, I can show if needed.
The viewer sees they're jetons, instantly ~~
Re: Any other ND jetons on the guide?
What you're mentioning of valued jetons which ~~~
No other ND Roulette jetons on ChipGuide I know of
I think that once you accept the fact ~~~
Re: French roulette v AR.
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Re: Thank you, Team ChipGuide 👍
Shouldn't those be listed under jetons?
Re: Don't start him off again.
rofl rofl Joking, yes! rofl rofl
Re: Phew.
Re: Phew.
Re: I know.
They were previously though no mention of Roulette
Here is how they were previously listed ~~~
The above are ChipĢuide images
...and this is what happened after ChipGuide ~~~
...and here is my explanation in response.
And here is the documentation in the lead post ~~~
John, please stop. I was joking. Nobody cares!
And you're okay with his posts?
Re: Care?
Re: And yet again, facts?
Re: Oh, stop whining.
Re: The answer.
Three (3) days ago a QUESTION was asked.
...and a perfect ANSWER followed
Remember, folks, that this jeton was listed under
I have not spoken to Charles.
Re: Addressed many times.
Re: Try to stay on the same track.
We have non-denomination Roulette chips ~~
Re: You are correct......
Thanks. Though you were a big help......
Re: First 2 you must have deleted.........
Yeah. .No file and then forgot CG credit
There is only one sollution to end this
In my lead post I included documentation
Re: More than presented my "case" as you put it.
And you surely know I don't read your posts. grin
Re: Yup, sure do.
Again, this is the documentation in my posr to CG.
Re: Again, this is the documentation in my posr to
Re: Yep.
Re: Haha, that was almost funny.
Re: I wondered about that.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg