You ASS/U/ME When you say he read them... I said emails, not which specific emails, but you as always want to spin a false narrative like a liar always does. See how does hiding behind technicalities feel when done to you?

1. Who receives the mail at the address board@mogh.org? or did you fabricate that as we know you like to do?

2 You also share the Siskin was copied, is that the whole board then? did they all receive it?

3. Where is the response from them authorizing the report. Share a little. Share all, that's transparency.

3a) Have you doctored or photoshopped these emails. they do not look to be in their entirety. (you are proven to not be trustworthy so I must ask)

4. Oscars videos are educational, He has fair use, he IS NOT REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ANY POLICY YOU HAVE to exercise his rights as a citizen, unless agreed to we do NOT have to follow your policies as a matter of law.

5. You have terrorized and harassed Oscar enough, as per your strategy, for him to give up. I will not sir. You cannot terrorize or harass me into calling you out when you act like this.

6. And maybe most importantly, you FINALLY ADMIT there is no copyright issue, just an internal policy, which is no more than a suggestion which may or not be done. You also here admit that it was indeed YOU who filed the report on Oscar and on the basis of what? Why did you leave out your report to YouTube? It must have been a copyright complaint as their policy is right here:

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2807622?hl=en

7. So your entire claim was done to YouTube completely on the issue of copyright? Which you don't have, you also did it knowing full and well that he had NO RECOURSE with YouTube as stated in their terms, agreed to and accepted unless he complied with your non binding request. (which pisses you off so you retaliate). This is good for the hobby Charles. It's a good look for the CCA too and the Guide.Makes me want to buy a lifetime membership to such a nice place. (NOT).

8. Your YouTube claim was entirely on Copyright. You lied yet again.

I'm interested why you excluded your report to them in your partial screen Shots. I'm curious what you put in the column that says: Copyright Owner Name (Required).

I believe most all of the 1100 +/- members of this club are good and respectable folks enjoying a hobby. I believe the club is a great entity and if you were not involved or matters handled so poorly I would support it 100%, almost single handedly YOU keep me from doing so, morally and financially. And you abuse members and the image of the CCA and MOGH and Guide with these antics. Not sure how you slither around the convention this year after the abuse you throw out. I don't trust you, I believe you are unhinged and god knows what else you are capable of, and will tell you right here and right now do NOT attempt to interact with me. I am all for the good of the club, IMO you are not that.

Oscar, I suggest you don't be worn out from Charles as is his intention and post on your youtube main page somewhere:

"Fair Use Statement:

The videos and materials presented on this YouTube channel are intended solely for educational purposes. Any copyrighted material incorporated herein is utilized without any profit-making motive, but rather for the purposes of education, scholarship, research, criticism, comment, and news reporting, all of which constitute 'Fair Use' under Section 107 of the United States Copyright Act.

If any copyright holder believes that their material has been used improperly, please contact us and we will immediately address the issue. Our goal is to respect all intellectual property rights and to make beneficial use of legally protected material while managing within the boundaries of 'Fair Use'."