be any evidence showing who submitted these supposedly stolen images? Or just more assumptions as we have seen in the past? Proving an image was lifted from ebay does not prove who did it. Anyone could have, even someone who may be trying to discredit the Chip Guide.

The proper thing to do if someone finds an improperly posted image is to inform the Chip Guide so they can do something about it, which they have in the past, but that doesn't fit the narrative that certain people seem hell bent on delivering. I have been waiting for proof of misdoings by the Chip Guide promised on past threads, but I haven't seen anything yet. No proof who submitted the chips under Jimmy Renner's name (or whatever that name was). No proof Charles Kaplan submitted any image which has been discussed. Just supposition and mudslinging. And, ironically, this particular poster complained they were accused of doing something on PCF without proof. And then does it repeatedly themselves. I am always inclined to hear people out and give them the benefit of the doubt, but I have seen enough of this already.

Michael Siskin