…as the initial conversation steered into a different direction.

I gather from the comments in the previous discussion that while some think that it’s relevant information for the hobby (on example being rarity impacts pricing) that TCG can provide, others are of the view that it would be best keeping TCG «� apolitical� » given pricing and value are sensitive topics for anyone’s collection.

I am not a CCA member and as a result, maybe my opinion doesn’t matter to any of you in the context of a discussion affecting TCG, but I’ll say this. I personally strongly encourage the research effort and I think there is a place for that information whether on TCG or somewhere else, but that information has to be as accurate as possible and verifiable by anyone. I don’t think TCG should accept any lower research standards (because I think it’s a fantastic resource and I hope it will stay that way)

PocketAces