~~~ to my submission in this thread.

ChipGuide images

...and a previous submission of the same exact chip (58) which was submitted as a UFC and wound up here
. Thus Virgil's lead post asking which is correct and my response was to ask ChipGuide how the assumption was made since there could have been more than one admin involved as I previously mentioned above.

The correctios on both pages should follow; ABC in the most recent and the previous should not include the same ABC (58) chip.

It was a good catch by Virgil Foss...

I am not even sure at this point if ChipGuide decided to place my image anywhere else in ChipGuide...

ChipGuide images.