The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: The best possible photos are probably right un

Really? If they were, surely I would have found them, yes?
I've asked many, many people about them over the years and as I live in the middle of nowhere I seriously doubt that they are right under my nose. It's taken me well over a decade to find the only photo of the Clermont one I've seen.
I will continue to try to find out more and will tell Richard/Mark if relevant to the book.
I was happy to find the Clermont photo but will keep it to myself for the moment as it isn't really worth the bother of letting others see it right now.
I like to add information that was previously unknown about any UK casinos so that others can share in the enjoyment. I also enjoy adding new items to the guide for the same reason.
This thread has managed to help in a small way, thanks to David telling us what he knows about the Playboy one although he probably did it to shut the pair of us up. Regardless, it helps me so that's good.

Messages In This Thread

(Message Deleted by Poster)
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: A gold one?
Re: A gold one?
A gold one? Here's an exact description of it ~~~
Re: 1st Playboy book.
I, too, seem to recall a greater value tha £8,000
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Tom mentions the cost of the first £100,000 ~~~
Re: Negotiable plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
I responded to your post you made in my thread ~~.
..and here are my responses.
Re: I responded to your post you made in my thread
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: It's not that hard, surely.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Rubbish.
The best possible photos are probably right under
Re: The best possible photos are probably right un
Yep. It all confirmed Tom was 100% correct ~~~
Re: Yep.
Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~
Re: Yep, that is clear.
Nothing needed to be confirmed with what Tom said
Re: As I suspected, just speculation.
I explained the thing about the diamonds ~~~.
He clearly is responding in a PLAYBOY thread ~~~
Now I have one question for you, Garin.
Re: That's an easy one.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Thanks David.
...and it also appears that Tom got the info ~~~
Re: Assumptions.
I think you're on the right track with the mixup ~
That would be for either or both ChipGuide Webmast
Re: Assumptions.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg