The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Thanks David.

Indeed and I was going to as I'd prefer to hear it straight from the horse's mouth as opposed to 2nd hand but didn't really want to bother him with it. It still makes me think that the facts were possibly mixed up between the 2 plaques but at least it clears up for certain that it exists and makes sense to me. The Clermont one would have been used many times although the Playboy one (if made for Victor) wouldn't have been.
The chip guide doesn't mention that it was gold either but yes, maybe an update about the diamonds.
Asking 50+ people wasn't a problem as I was on a mission to find out about it and that's how research works as I'm sure you know.
I will continue to ask about any other plaques but I think that the gold one can be put to rest now which I am happy about.

Messages In This Thread

(Message Deleted by Poster)
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: A gold one?
Re: A gold one?
A gold one? Here's an exact description of it ~~~
Re: 1st Playboy book.
I, too, seem to recall a greater value tha £8,000
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Tom mentions the cost of the first £100,000 ~~~
Re: Negotiable plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
I responded to your post you made in my thread ~~.
..and here are my responses.
Re: I responded to your post you made in my thread
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: It's not that hard, surely.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Rubbish.
The best possible photos are probably right under
Re: The best possible photos are probably right un
Yep. It all confirmed Tom was 100% correct ~~~
Re: Yep.
Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~
Re: Yep, that is clear.
Nothing needed to be confirmed with what Tom said
Re: As I suspected, just speculation.
I explained the thing about the diamonds ~~~.
He clearly is responding in a PLAYBOY thread ~~~
Now I have one question for you, Garin.
Re: That's an easy one.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Thanks David.
...and it also appears that Tom got the info ~~~
Re: Assumptions.
I think you're on the right track with the mixup ~
That would be for either or both ChipGuide Webmast
Re: Assumptions.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg