And elevating it from a short (concise) story into a novel which wasn't needed as most people will just skip over it now.
It was about the Clermont plaque although obviously I knew that the Playboy one would get a mention but it just became the usual drivel about the £10 plaque and whatever else you felt like waffling on about.
As for the photo you put of Tom's book that mentions the plaques, it was pointless as both Richard and I have the book. You could at least have put the updated version instead of the old one but even then to say that it is still correct when it clearly isn't was just ridiculous.
I realise you have a tenuous grasp on reality/facts at the best of times and prefer to criticise (if constructive then it's useful) but it annoys me when you just hijack my posts with irrelevant comments.
You did eventually put some useful information up (amazingly) but you still muddied the waters with the comment about 10 (not 11) £100,000 plaques as it wasn't made clear that you meant other ones and not Playboy. I doubt that you'll understand that which is fine.
I really can't be bothered to explain any more so I'll just leave you to have the last word and hope you get some more pleasure out of it.