It's just the fact that the £10 plaque always rears its head whenever anything Playboy gets mentioned.
Did you just do it to take the shine off my finding the photo after years of trying?
We all know you found the photo of the £10 and well done but it doesn't mean you know anything else about Playboy items from London so I don't see why you bring it up all of the time unless it's just so you can be involved. Maybe if you'd quoted a later version of Tom's statement about the plaques as the one you show is incorrect in many ways although it helped to fill in gaps and was what was known at the time.

“For Tom to mention the £100,000 "plaques" in his book and the exact process how they became, he had to have got the information from someone who knew what they were talking about; either Victor or someone very close to Victor... and there could be very good reason why nothing else is known (mentioned); especially if only used on a private game and in a private room where nobody else would know they existed -- except the manufacturer... and I think there were exactly 10 pieces of the £100,000 made and not 11, as with other very low productions where one piece was kept in shop”.

Nobody knew they existed (really, then why would he show it off) and you think there were 10 not 11 £100,000 plaques? What!!?
No idea where you got that from but if you can back it up with more facts then great.
So did David confirm it definitely says Playboy and has diamonds? Brilliant if so.
I want nothing as my post was about the Clermont plaque but obviously talk always gets to the Playboy one.

As I've said, I delete my posts when you hijack them and waffle on about irrelevant stuff which you do all the time when I post on here. I don't post something and delete it if it gets no "bites" so as stated earlier, kettle and pot.
I prefer not to interact with you as your rambling, word salad sentences give me a headache but I'll ask as it would be good to know where the 10 not 11 £100,000 information comes from.