The Chip Board Recent Archive

Messages In This Thread

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.

Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.

Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.

Re: A gold one?

Re: A gold one?

A gold one? Here's an exact description of it ~~~

Re: 1st Playboy book.

I, too, seem to recall a greater value tha £8,000

Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.

Tom mentions the cost of the first £100,000 ~~~

Re: Negotiable plaque.

Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.

I responded to your post you made in my thread ~~.

..and here are my responses.

Re: I responded to your post you made in my thread

Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.

Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.

Re: It's not that hard, surely.

Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.

Re: Rubbish.

The best possible photos are probably right under

Re: The best possible photos are probably right un

Yep. It all confirmed Tom was 100% correct ~~~

Re: Yep.

Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~

Re: Yep, that is clear.

Nothing needed to be confirmed with what Tom said

Re: As I suspected, just speculation.

I explained the thing about the diamonds ~~~.

He clearly is responding in a PLAYBOY thread ~~~

Now I have one question for you, Garin.

Re: That's an easy one.

Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.

Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.

Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.

Re: Thanks David.

...and it also appears that Tom got the info ~~~

Re: Assumptions.

I think you're on the right track with the mixup ~

That would be for either or both ChipGuide Webmast

Re: Assumptions.