I would like everyone who is interested to give your opinion. There are several club members who deserve to be in our Hall Of Fame. I feel we wasted 2 or 3 years when we failed to induct anyone. To our credit we changed the procedure and I feel we our now on the right track. The loss of Eric was devastating not only to the club but the HOF also. Jim stepped in and is doing a great job but I feel he's probably playing a little catch up. That brings me to my point. Years ago the three publishers of the Chip Rack were recognized and inducted as a group. Very deserving. The early contributions of Ernie, Doc, and Mike were tremendous. Is there any reason why we can't do the same thing with the three members who took over that publication and have tackled that task with dedication, hard work, and above all, professionalism. Is their work any less important than the early work? I think the contributions are equal. I don't know how to change the rules(if we have to) or how we go about accomplishing this. That's why I would like input not only from HOF members but the entire membership. Now I know David, Jay, and the other guy from England are getting rich off this and that's OK. In my opinion if we accomplish this it catches us up, where we can add several more deserving members in the next few years. Thanks, Jim