...now you're claiming that "My response was on topic; stealing Roulette chips."

This is yet another bizarre comment from you, since the post to which you responded was the following:

"Are any members lawyers? Can we get a semi-legal ruling?"

And the post to which Erik was referring said...

"Just out of curiosity, it would be interesting if Chipboard Members could post if they think taking the following five items from a casino would be considered HARVESTING or STEALING:

1) Roulette Chips.
2) Poker Tournament Chips.
3) Ashtrays with the casino logo.
4) Room service menus from the hotel room with the casino logo.
5) The television in the room, which had the casino logo on the side of it."

So, I'll ask you... in what way, shape, or form were you "on topic" commenting strictly on stealing roulette chips?????

Your exact quote was:

"Really no need for a lawyer ~~~ since it's unlawful to take anyone's property, anywhere. The Big Book tells us this."

I don't see roulette chips mentioned anywhere in your post nor singled out in any of the posts to which you responded. Your response to me was nothing more than obfuscation, trying to defend your nonsensical post in the first place.

You want to try again?