The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 22

Re: It was GEMACO and not Paul-Son (GPI) in this c

"it was purported to be GEMACO"

- good point. Under FRE (Federal Rules of Evidence) 902(7), the presence of the labels and trademarks would permit a party to introduce the item into evidence without separately showing that it is what it purports to be, but that evidence can be rebutted.

Messages In This Thread

AC uses preshuffled decks in the shoe NO MORE
What does a "pre-shuffled" deck look like?....
Jim wonder if a Paulson employee sent out a deck
It was GEMACO and not Paul-Son (GPI) in this case.
That would be a lot of coincidences
I cannot understand why the debts to the
Re: I cannot understand why the debts to the
Thanks, Jim. Interesting.
It was GEMACO and not Paul-Son (GPI) in this case.
Re: It was GEMACO and not Paul-Son (GPI) in this c

Copyright 2022 David Spragg