I meant no harm other than to agree with Jim about the hate posts... though I admit I may have misunderstood the term "disappointment" being used and thought it was to mean in response to Jim's post that those posts he referred to were only disappointment posts and not hate posts.

In other words; I thought Jim was saying posts should not include hate... and I agreed with his post along with listing some posts that I expressed displayed hate; which had nothing to do with Phyllis other than to explain what I considered hate posts and not disappointment posts.

Please do explain what you feel I did. I truly do not grasp on to what you're saying.