In other words, lets say 'the law' walks in and says you need to increase the win %, you would have to respond, 'but I can't, the darn thing generates truly random numbers'. Truly random means it might never payout. That would probably not be acceptable by law so they prevent that by forcing a non-random 'random' algorithm? You cant walk up to a blackjack dealer and tell them to increase the win % right? Right, because that is truly random.
Seems like a contradiction that's all. I'm confused.
Even if somehow we can mimic real, natural, random, life, I would still be very skeptical of betting against a machine rather than live, non-biased cards.
|