The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 18

I don't agree .......................

1) Josh offered Rick insurance against loss/damage. The majority of this small group will agree that was the right thing to do.

I don't agree. I would not have offered Rick insurance since I already guarantee delivery or refund without having to offer insurance.

2) Rick turned down Josh's offer of insurance. I think this small group of people would agree that wasn't the right thing to do in order to be protected against loss/damage.

This would not happen with me since there was no need for him to make that decision

3) Even though Rick decided to turn down the insurance offer, Josh proposed to work with Rick to repurchase his order at a reasonable discounted cost.
I too would propose to work with Rick: either a repacement or 100% refund of the purchase price, including shipping charges. That is the only decision Rick would have to make.

I'm going out on a limb and say that Rick probably would not have had a complaint if he had dealt with me.

BTW, Archie showe a copy of his receipt from the PO. Most of mine include delivery con. My deal is: if I verify the package is delivered, I will not replace or refund (unless it arrives damaged). If the PO does not show it was delivered, then I'll replace or refund. Pretty simple. By adding Del conf I almost never buy ins (unless the buyer specifically asks for ins, which I try to discourage). I've probably saved over $1000 in insur. Pack it right. Staple and AND tape ends. If the package is real expensive I use a priority box and paper tape all edges. Always use brown paper tape. The PO insists on paper tape for registered mail. My theory is that a package with paper tape is less likely to be tampered with since slicing open a paper taped package is easily detected. This is not the case with clear tape.

Also, unless the package is expensive (over $500) I send first class. By sending first class rather than prioity, it covers the cost of del conf and usually adds no more than a day. Of course if the buyer askes for priority, he gets it.

Messages In This Thread

Courtesy and professionalism...a question
hit 'em with the negative.
Here are his negs...see any similarities?
This is a member?....WOW!!!
With all those negs ...
Re: With all those negs ...I was warned
WOW! Less than 30 seconds after my post...
Something positive from another member
Rick, can you post his ebay name?
email me and I will give it to you
Rick Can I have money too? LOL....
Holy Hot Controversy Batman
Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback?
Re: Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback?
Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
What a load of crap!
Rick Is 100% Correct
I'll bet you 100 chips that the USPS will tell any
Wrong
Let's hope it doesn't get to "a court of law" grin
Rick, I think you are way out of line.
David with all due respect...
"you are not privy to the emails"
Well David...since you ask...
A poor attitude from you also.
I disagree with you, David
Opinion noted, and I will add......
Re: A poor attitude from you also.
OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
Re: OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
Aye Carumba.....David,David,
Re: Aye Carumba.....David,David,
I was told that I could NOT insure To Canada
Priority mail to Canada is insured
Re: What a load of crap!
Wow.....
Josh.........
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Here is my thinking
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Send it to Vegas!
Re: Send it to Vegas!
Here is what to do.......
But who knows.......
Question for Rick
My take on "Insurance"
Re: Question for Rick
Raises a question though........
Re: Raises a question though........
At the end of the day though,
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Good Point
HOLD ON GUYS.....
Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Code of Ethics?
Re: Code of Ethics?
I agree ......
I don't want to go that route
Re: I agree ......
We Have Been Over This Before and
Just a suggestion
Everyone has an opinion, so do I
I would never ship anything of value w/o insurance
So, Rick... Care to tell the class what you've ..
I learned this:
Rick you sure have a lot of bad luck!
Since you asked for opinions, here's mine...
Why is it so hard to understand the risk of loss?
Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
I N S U R A N C E
Show me a link to the auction...
I haven't read the auction description ...
Under insurance, it says, "none"
INSURANCE WAS NOT OFFERED!
THEN WHY DID SPRAGG SAY IT WAS; AND YOU REFUSED IT
No idea and because this has gone on for far too l
Lets end this discussion..this is getting silly
Don't be a liar Rick
Re: Don't be a liar Rick
Yawn.............
Re: I N S U R A N C E
Re: Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
Oops. I didn't mean for my post...
You are a fine, upstanding guy, Brian
Re: Wherer is the basic rule of law..
It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Yes...
Re: Yes...
Re: Yes...
Re: litigated to death long ago
Find a case that shows that I'm wrong
Here's the "UCC" From Cornell Univ Law School site
See Part 3: § 2-301 General Obligations of Parties
It's UCC section 2-509
ok here's my rebuttal argument grin ...
Nice try vbg
Re: Nice try vbg
In this case, Gene, you are wrong
Re:Sorry I pitched the fork grin
Wait, Aaron Should Be Around Soon vbg
Not that soon I wouldn't think
Who needs Aaron, anyway? We have Gene to interpret
Re: you are wrong Maybe Not!!!
ok, now you have me
Thanks, Michael.
One final point
PLease
Rich, you have holes in your example...
Re: Rich, you have holes in your example...
I guess we can agree to disagree...
Re: I guess we can agree to disagree...
arrrg!!!
I'm done.
Also I wanted to say thanks for the debate...
Here's a better example:
I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Mailing receipt ..
Excellent point, Michael (about no insurance).
You are 100% correct , Barry
I don't agree .......................
Yes, as I noted elsewhere ...
Good grief John....
"Good grief.."? Josh shows us he offered insurance
OK HERE'S MY 2 CENTS ON THIS SUBJECT!!!!!!!!
Hmmmm...guess this isn't going away
Geez... I looked at your auction and don't see....
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question

Copyright 2022 David Spragg