In my example there is NEVER a problem. Everyone's happy.
Why do it any other way. The argument about saving money works in you $1 example. Ok. In every auction where the final price is $3 or less,the buyer gets screwed.
this topic is pretty well exhausted. I guess the bottom line is that you feel that Josh is somehow saving buyers money wheras I feel the I have protected the buyer without forcing him between choosing to buy insurance or not. I would make more money if I went Josh's route but a smooth transaction far outweighs the buck or two I would make doing it.
