The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 18

Hmmmm...guess this isn't going away

Here is the deal:
There are sellers who state in their ads that they only ship to the US(the way that eBay sets things up these days,even on my auctions it looks like I only ship to the USA).I always ask,unless I miss it,if the seller will ship to Canada. The answer is almost always a yes.
I know that this seller was a club member and I told him that I was also a club member. I think(long time ago now),that I paid with well concealed US cash or...worse case scenario..a money order in US funds). He said that there was no problem selling to me in Canada.
Not once did he mention insurance to me!

You are missing a point here Brian:

The fact that the chips never arrived is not the issue! The issue is how the whole thing went down and how the seller handled the situation!
I went to the convention and when I came home the chips were not here yet. I thought that was strange as other items I had purchased from Vegas at the same time had arrived.I emailed the seller and asked if there was a problem. His email basically said: "Chips were mailed on June 18th". That's it!....that was almost the exact email back. I waited another week and told him that the chips were still not here and his answer was the same...no emotion,no caring...nothing. I asked him what he would do if the chips did not arrive and he said....it can take a month. Fine....again,after another week I emailed him and he said..it hasn't been 5 weeks yet(it was the day before a full 5 weeks) Once again...no emotion or care.
Finally I emailed him yesterday and then out of the blue he lays this insurance thing on me like now it is my fault. THAT IS THE ISSUE!
As for the feedback....yes,I did check them and yes they are old BUT...if you look at how he dealt with those feedbacks,he basically does not take any responsibility at all...he simply says...oops,you did not have insurance...tough. That is unacceptable
Look...defend the guy if you want. But this is the way that it happened and if you wish to defend his policies.....that's fine. BUT...read through the drivel and see what the real issue is.
Here is the link to the auction.
DESPITE this whole thing,you will notice that I still have not left negative feedback. WHY....it is because I respect my fellow club members and that is what I ask of them. I seriously thought that he would come through with the product and end this amicably....looks like it is not going to happen,so I will decide what to do over the next couple of days.

Messages In This Thread

Courtesy and professionalism...a question
hit 'em with the negative.
Here are his negs...see any similarities?
This is a member?....WOW!!!
With all those negs ...
Re: With all those negs ...I was warned
WOW! Less than 30 seconds after my post...
Something positive from another member
Rick, can you post his ebay name?
email me and I will give it to you
Rick Can I have money too? LOL....
Holy Hot Controversy Batman
Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback?
Re: Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback?
Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
What a load of crap!
Rick Is 100% Correct
I'll bet you 100 chips that the USPS will tell any
Wrong
Let's hope it doesn't get to "a court of law" grin
Rick, I think you are way out of line.
David with all due respect...
"you are not privy to the emails"
Well David...since you ask...
A poor attitude from you also.
I disagree with you, David
Opinion noted, and I will add......
Re: A poor attitude from you also.
OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
Re: OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
Aye Carumba.....David,David,
Re: Aye Carumba.....David,David,
I was told that I could NOT insure To Canada
Priority mail to Canada is insured
Re: What a load of crap!
Wow.....
Josh.........
Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit.
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Here is my thinking
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Send it to Vegas!
Re: Send it to Vegas!
Here is what to do.......
But who knows.......
Question for Rick
My take on "Insurance"
Re: Question for Rick
Raises a question though........
Re: Raises a question though........
At the end of the day though,
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Good Point
HOLD ON GUYS.....
Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
Code of Ethics?
Re: Code of Ethics?
I agree ......
I don't want to go that route
Re: I agree ......
We Have Been Over This Before and
Just a suggestion
Everyone has an opinion, so do I
I would never ship anything of value w/o insurance
So, Rick... Care to tell the class what you've ..
I learned this:
Rick you sure have a lot of bad luck!
Since you asked for opinions, here's mine...
Why is it so hard to understand the risk of loss?
Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
I N S U R A N C E
Show me a link to the auction...
I haven't read the auction description ...
Under insurance, it says, "none"
INSURANCE WAS NOT OFFERED!
THEN WHY DID SPRAGG SAY IT WAS; AND YOU REFUSED IT
No idea and because this has gone on for far too l
Lets end this discussion..this is getting silly
Don't be a liar Rick
Re: Don't be a liar Rick
Yawn.............
Re: I N S U R A N C E
Re: Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
Oops. I didn't mean for my post...
You are a fine, upstanding guy, Brian
Re: Wherer is the basic rule of law..
It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code
Yes...
Re: Yes...
Re: Yes...
Re: litigated to death long ago
Find a case that shows that I'm wrong
Here's the "UCC" From Cornell Univ Law School site
See Part 3: § 2-301 General Obligations of Parties
It's UCC section 2-509
ok here's my rebuttal argument grin ...
Nice try vbg
Re: Nice try vbg
In this case, Gene, you are wrong
Re:Sorry I pitched the fork grin
Wait, Aaron Should Be Around Soon vbg
Not that soon I wouldn't think
Who needs Aaron, anyway? We have Gene to interpret
Re: you are wrong Maybe Not!!!
ok, now you have me
Thanks, Michael.
One final point
PLease
Rich, you have holes in your example...
Re: Rich, you have holes in your example...
I guess we can agree to disagree...
Re: I guess we can agree to disagree...
arrrg!!!
I'm done.
Also I wanted to say thanks for the debate...
Here's a better example:
I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Re: I don't buy this argument..
Mailing receipt ..
Excellent point, Michael (about no insurance).
You are 100% correct , Barry
I don't agree .......................
Yes, as I noted elsewhere ...
Good grief John....
"Good grief.."? Josh shows us he offered insurance
OK HERE'S MY 2 CENTS ON THIS SUBJECT!!!!!!!!
Hmmmm...guess this isn't going away
Geez... I looked at your auction and don't see....
Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question

Copyright 2022 David Spragg