The item in your post that caused me to respond was your reference to my so called 'BS'. The only post I had made prior to that statement was where I responded to a series of posts dealing with whether thehunters could be prosecuted.

There is a real difference between what is legal and what is right (on that we agree). However I sincerely doubt the owners of the property care whether a bunch of knuckleheads want chips in blocks of concrete. There concern ismost likely (especially after the phone calls from their insurer and their lawyer) was the liability if one of them got hurt. I'm surprised that there wasn't a sign up notwithstanding the chips.