The subtle point was not a defense of Bob but an attack on Borland. Why are Borlands considered collectible and not a blight on the hobby?

BTW, no one seems to care about the fake ivories. Heck one well respected collector on the board sees the fakes as works of art and priced reasonably. No one on the board besides me thought that what he said was idiotic and quite damaging to ivory collectors.

So if fake ivories are ok. Borland fakes are ok. Then how does one complain about what Bob has done?