Purposely left out.
Messages In This Thread
- Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology??
- I will throw this into the mix
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: They were obs. at one time
- Re: They were obs. at one time
- Re: They were retired
- What is double custody?
- Re: What is double custody?
- It's what i had after my divorce.
- Re: What is double custody?
- Thanks for explaining...
- Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion...
- Obsolete ... "not available"
- Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion...
- Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion...
- Re: just not the commonly accepted one
- Re: just not the commonly accepted one
- I need these chips !
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Obsolete vs retired ...
- 30 lbs in whose favor?
- Re: 30 lbs in whose favor?
- Only when the redemption has expired
- Purposely left out.
- Re: Question on terminology??
- I Ifully agree with this definition
- Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Say what you will ...
- Which part of NV is AC in?
- Whoops - that was for John.
- That's the issue David ...
- Re: That's the issue David ...
- I doubt if you have a rack of Playboy $500's David
- I doubt if I have a rack of either
- It's not complicated at all David ..
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- I must disagree .....
- That means nothing
- Re: That means nothing
- i would say they are retired.
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- New classification - "Gone"
- Re: so the 24k chip in my safe is a fraud?
- "Finito" sounds a little more classy
- Re: lost to history
- Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Arch-Miester....
- Re: are not the same in A.C
- Gene; I thought that we were ...
- Re: Gene; I"OBSOLETE".
- Re: Gene; OBSOLETE".
- Re: Gene; OBSOLETE".
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- You are not all paying attention
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Terry, Yes,Yes,Yes
- This is how I do it...
- MY ANSWER: RETIRED OR OBSOLETE
- RETIRED OR OBSOLETE
- Re: RETIRED OR OBSOLETE
- IM OBSOLETE
- Re: IM OBSOLETE
- IMO, Obsolete
- True....
Copyright 2022 David Spragg