Custom Search
FAQ's
|
Archives
|
Formatting
|
First Time Users Click Here
Trouble Ticket
Forgot your Password?
RSS
Return to Index
Gallery Index
Read Responses
The Chip Board Archive 16
30 lbs in whose favor?
In Response To:
Obsolete vs retired ...
()
I had to type something here just to make you open the message
Marlow Casino Chips Website
Messages In This Thread
Question on terminology??
Re: Question on terminology??
Re: Question on terminology??
Re: Question on terminology??
Re: Question on terminology??
Re: Question on terminology??
I will throw this into the mix
Re: Question on terminology??
Re: They were obs. at one time
Re: They were obs. at one time
Re: They were retired
What is double custody?
Re:
What is double custody?
It's what i had after my divorce.
Re:
What is double custody?
Thanks for explaining...
Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion...
Obsolete ... "not available"
Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion...
Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion...
Re: just not the commonly accepted one
Re: just not the commonly accepted one
I need these chips !
Re: Question on terminology??
Obsolete vs retired ...
30 lbs in whose favor?
Re: 30 lbs in whose favor?
Only when the redemption has expired
Purposely left out.
Re: Question on terminology??
I Ifully agree with this definition
Jim, I think there is a further distinction
Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
No 'point', you just agreed with me
Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
Say what you will ...
Which part of NV is AC in?
Whoops - that was for John.
That's the issue David ...
Re: That's the issue David ...
I doubt if you have a rack of Playboy $500's David
I doubt if I have a rack of either
It's not complicated at all David ..
Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
I must disagree .....
That means nothing
Re: That means nothing
i would say they are retired.
Re: I must disagree .....
Re: I must disagree .....
Re: I must disagree .....
Re: I must disagree .....
Re: I must disagree .....
New classification - "Gone"
Re: so the 24k chip in my safe is a fraud?
"Finito" sounds a little more classy
Re: lost to history
Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Arch-Miester....
Re: are not the same in A.C
Gene; I thought that we were ...
Re: Gene; I"OBSOLETE".
Re: Gene; OBSOLETE".
Re: Gene; OBSOLETE".
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
You are not all paying attention
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Re: Additional considerations on the issue
Terry, Yes,Yes,Yes
This is how I do it...
MY ANSWER: RETIRED OR OBSOLETE
RETIRED OR OBSOLETE
Re: RETIRED OR OBSOLETE
IM OBSOLETE
Re: IM OBSOLETE
IMO, Obsolete
True....
FAQ's
|
Archives
|
File Upload
|
Formatting
|
First Time Users Click Here
Copyright 2022 David Spragg