"Second, there was only ONE chip that you bought from us at the Reno show, and it was NOT one of the chips that you allege we got from Carl."
I bought a number of chips from you, 3 or 4. They all came from Carl Osborne.
The Castaways chips in question are clearly marked in the Chip Rack as counterfeits.

"Third, don't you think we would remember buying 40+ boxes of chips from someone? I think I would remember that. Dean did buy a couple chips from Carl, but not the quanity stated in the article."
You failed to understand it even after I had emailed you several times. I was told you bought "all he had left with him of 2 chips"
I did not say how many that was.
In any event, as I already stated, I removed the comment in question immediately and apologised on behalf of the person that made it (even though he maintained it was true). I checked back and found I emailed you twice to that effect but you didnt have the decency to acknowledge either email.

"Fourth, I am right about that entire article being mere hear-say, and I quote: "My article was based on interviews with a number of people". Did you ever interview Carl?"
No, I did not. But at least two people that contributed to the article did, and I had the transcript of one of those interviews.

"Sixth, since you maintain the site, you are also responsible for what is on that site, and if fact bores you, then I guess we have to live with mere hear-say. I prefer facts myself."
Whoops, I must have missed something
Greg Susong maintains this site. Is he responsible for everything on here?