I did write ""The voucher or NCV chips used to advance into the larger tourney are not cash-exchangeable instruments and should be treated as being no different than making it to the next level of the tourney, not as taxable income."" and the next sentence read ""While the current tax code doesn't agree with that view, it should.""

I also wrote ""your interpretation of tax law is just that, your interpretation"" and that is still true.

You wrote ""Whoa there. It was not my intent to insult anyone and you first came after me rather than the other way around."" Calling someones beliefs on a subject "a load of crap" is why I made my first post on these matters. You were indeed hurling insults without provocation.