Lets look at 2 examples. In the case of recently shown chips:

1. The designer is not a Club member
2. The people responsible for the 'group buy' are not Club members
3. The manufacturer is a club member
4. Some 're-sellers' will be club members, others will not be.

A different scenario. The 'Tangiers' chips which were similarly debated last year:

1. The designer is a Club member
2. The person that had the chips made is a Club member
3. The manufacturer is not a club member
4. Some 're-sellers' are club members, almost all are not.

IMO, Most of the people 'involved' would claim 'restriction of business' if the club tried to do anything.

Also, IMO, the addition of the word 'fantasy' as suggested on the chips would put people of buying them at all. I also think that to print 'fantasy' on the edges would be cost prohibitive.

Finally. What would you do about the chips made by GGS, which I would suggest cause more problems in respect of 'wrong disclosure' than any other such 'fantasy' chips, and GGS probably sell more of these chips than everyone else put together.