The statute says, "tokens" and "issue." Can you be sure these do not include casino chips? NO. There is no clear definition. It is poorly worded. Discuss the actual wording of the definition or I have no idea why you are saying what you are saying. Point to actual language. The language you are using is NOT in the statute or any case law. The laws of the individual states is irrelevant, as far as I know to the HPA.

I'm sorry, I have no idea on what basis you can make that argument. I have quoted the statute. You are making reference to nothing. I am sure you have a basis for your position, and I would like to know what it is.

Michael Siskin