>>(Moneymaker was the exception not the rule).

Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't there at least three internet qualifiers at the final table in the last World Series?

>>>There are many examples of top players winning significant pots, and even tournaments, by playing trash, but pursuading the other (weaker) player to fold the better hand.

This is what you consider the "skill factor"? For each instance of such a display of "skill" these same folks get taken to the cleaners because the "weak" player wasn't as weak as they thought.

I don't tend to admire those who fire blanks at someone with a loaded gun....

>>>And if you think all you need is a little luck, let me get a deck of cards.

It is because I *know* you need more than just a little luck that I will keep my day job thank you.

>>>There is a reason that so many poker players support themselves

I have yet to personally meet ANYONE who could actually support him or herself with gambling of any type... and I would venture to guess that such folks can be counted in very small numbers....

Enjoy!!!!!